This volume assesses how the Satirist Lucilius (2nd century BC) and the statesman and orator Cicero (1st century BC), in their attempt at integrating mos maiorum and Greek virtue (ἀρετή), give the opportunity for the apologist Lactantius (3rd-4th century AD) to confront two witnesses of Roman cultural history in the field of “military” and “ethical” virtus: he remoulds their assertions through a strongly biased, but deeply conceived reenactment.
In Div. inst. 6.5.1 ̶ 6.24, Lactantius rejects both the definitions of virtus exposed by Lucilius (vv. 1326 ̶ 1338 Marx) and Cicero’s reflections upon the officia vivendi and his notion of honestum (Off. 1.34 ̶ 41): one after the other, they are accordingly involved by the apologist in a vehement attack against the Roman empire.
By regarding the pre-Christian empire as one based on injustice, Lactantius claims a demand for a restored virtus, grounded in agnitione Dei. After contrasting Lucilius’s stance about commoda patriai (v. 1337) as the peak of traditional Roman virtue, the apologist stigmatizes its underlying utilitarian ethics, and argues with the interplay between politics, law, and philosophy, on which Cicero allegedly founded the legitimacy of Roman expansionist imperialism.
eBook published on:May 4, 2026eBook ISBN:9783112238684Hardcover published on:May 4, 2026Hardcover ISBN:9783112238677Front matter:8Main content:254
Open AccessFrontmatter
I Open AccessContents
V Open AccessRingraziamenti
Open AccessIntroduzione
1 Open Access1 Lattanzio: dai commmoda patriai agli officia belli
3 Open Access2 Lucilio fra «altrömische» virtus e dottrina greca
34 Open Access3 Il consul togatus e la virtus
87 Open Access4 Alla luce della nuova fede
171 Open AccessAbbreviazioni
Open AccessBibliografia
Open AccessIndex locorum
Open AccessIndex rerum et nominum
Open AccessPrevious Volumes of the Series
No comments:
Post a Comment