Edited by:
Cécile Michel
,
Michael Friedrich
and
Jorrit Kelder
Ancient cultures are studied through literary sources and artefacts,
both of which are limited and often contradictory. Scholarly traditions
often privilege one type of evidence over the other, depending on their
research questions and the stories they want to tell. As a result, our
understanding of the past may be shaped by bias. New archaeological
discoveries force historians to rethink their views of the past. Missing
evidence, though difficult to identify, can lead to educated guesses
and a re-evaluation of previous ideas. However, over-reliance on a
single dataset leads to the risk of overlooking important perspectives.
While scholars have developed methods for dealing with insufficient
data, methodological reflection on the subject is rare.
This volume
presents case studies from ancient civilisations that explore how
different types of missing evidence (e.g. missing, contradictory or
neglected evidence) affect our perceptions of ancient cultures and shape
the narratives we provide. Covering Southwest Asia, China, India,
Greece, Etruria, early Christianity, Mesoamerica and Central Asian
Buddhism, it invites scholars to compare the situation in their own
fields to the state-of-the-art in others.
eBook ISBN:
9783112215692
Hardcover ISBN:
9783119144988
Safety & product resources
Open Access
|
V |
Cécile Michel, Michael Friedrich and Jorrit Kelder
Open Access
|
|
1 |
|
Absence of Evidence: Lost or Neglected
|
|
Christophe Helmke and Kerry Hull
Open Access
|
|
13 |
Alessandro Bausi
Open Access
|
|
65 |
Nicholas Sims-Williams
Open Access
|
|
95 |
|
Quantity of Evidence: Too Little or Too Much
|
|
Cécile Michel
Open Access
|
|
119 |
Pierre Tallet
Open Access
|
|
147 |
Michael Friedrich
Open Access
|
|
161 |
|
Quality of Evidence: Fragmentary or Contradictory
|
|
Jorrit Kelder
Open Access
|
|
201 |
Dominique Briquel
Open Access
|
|
221 |
|
In Lieu of a Conclusion
|
|
Oskar von Hinüber
Open Access
|
No comments:
Post a Comment