Classics@,
edited by a team working for the Center for Hellenic Studies and
headed by Gregory Nagy and James O'Donnell, is designed to bring
contemporary classical scholarship to a wide audience on the World
Wide Web. Each issue will be dedicated to its own topic, often with
guest editors, for an in-depth exploration of important current
problems in the field of Classics. We hope that Classics@ will
appeal not only to professional classicists, but also to the
intellectually curious who are willing to enter the conversation in our
discipline. We hope that they find that classical scholarship engages
issues of great significance to a wide range of cultural and
scholarly concerns and does so in a rigorous and challenging way.
Each issue of Classics@ is meant to be not static but
dynamic, continuing to evolve with interaction from its readers as
participants. New issues will appear when the editors think there is
good material to offer. Often it will emphasize work done in and
through the Center for Hellenic Studies, but it will also call
attention to fresh and interesting work presented elsewhere on the
web. It stresses the importance of research-in-progress, encouraging
collegial debate (while discouraging polemics for the sake of
polemics) as well as the timely sharing of important new information.
Issue 9
Issue 9: Defense Mechanisms in Interdisciplinary Approaches to Classical Studies and Beyond.
Psychologists speak of “defense mechanisms” in both negative and
positive terms: some of the many negative examples are denial,
repression, acting out, projection, undoing, rationalization,
intellectualization, and so on, while one of the few positive examples
is assertion, a way of responding that takes the middle ground between
aggressive and passive. In the spirit of this positive form of assertion
and in both the technical and non-technical sense of the expression
“defense mechanisms,” the present issue of Classics@ has been given its
title. The aim is to publish online research papers and essays in
Classics and in other disciplines, related or unrelated, that explore
strategies where the primary purpose is to defend assertively rather
than attack. The justification is straightforward: discoveries and
discovery procedures in research require and deserve a reasoned defense.
Issue 8
Issue 8: A Homer commentary in progress, eds. D. Frame, L. Muellner, and G. Nagy (coming soon)
Issue 7
Issue 7: Les femmes, le féminin et le politique après Nicole Loraux, Colloque de Paris (INHA), novembre 2007
is the result of a conference held in Paris (INHA, 15–17 November 2007)
which was co-organized by the Centre Louis Gernet (CNRS-EHESS), the
Équipe Phéacie (Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne and Université
Denis-Diderot Paris VII) and the Réseau National Interuniversitaire sur
le Genre (RING, Paris). The aim of the conference was to explore Nicole
Loraux’s legacy concerning the feminine and the polis both in Hellenic Studies and in feminist scholarship.
Issue 6
Issue 6: Reflecting on the Greek Epic Cycle
is the result of a conference held in Ancient Olympia on 9–10 July
2010, which was co-organized by the Center for Hellenic Studies (Harvard
University) and the Centre for the Study of Myth and Religion in Greek
and Roman Antiquity (University of Patras). The goal of the conference
was to explore problems concerning the surviving fragments of the Greek
Epic Cycle that have heretofore been neglected. Guest Editor: Efimia D.
Karakantza.
Issue 5
Issue 5: Proceedings of the Derveni Papyrus Conference
reflects a three-day symposium on the Derveni Papyrus hosted by the
Center for Hellenic Studies in July, 2008, on the occasion of the recent
publication of the edition by Theokritos Kouremenos, George M.
Parássoglou, and Kyriakos Tsantsanoglou (Florence, Olschki, 2006; the
text of the papyrus from that edition is available on this website here).
The symposium was an opportunity to gather scholars who in the course
of the past decades have been working on this text to address a set of
issues relating to the edition and integration of the papyrus, its
translation, and its interpretation.
Issue 4
Issue 4: The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues
is the online edition of a print volume published by the Center for
Hellenic Studies in 2009 (available through Harvard University Press, here).
This volume is the first collection of essays in English devoted to
discussion of the newly-recovered Sappho poem and two other incomplete
texts on the same papyri. Containing eleven new essays by leading
scholars, it addresses a wide range of textual and philological issues
connected with the find. Using different approaches, the contributions
demonstrate how the "New Sappho" can be appreciated as a gracefully
spare poetic statement regarding the painful inevitability of death and
aging. Guest Editors: Ellen Greene and Marilyn B. Skinner.
Issue 3
Issue 3: The Homerizon: Conceptual Interrogations in Homeric Studies
is the result of a colloquium held at the Center. The colloquium had as
its goals the serious interrogation of cherished assumptions about
Homeric “culture” and “texuality”; and the exploration of the wider
cultural significance of the perennial Homeric Question(s).
Issue 2
Issue 2: Ancient Mediterranean Cultural Informatics.
The second issue of Classics@ is the first edition of an ongoing
project of publication aimed at documenting this emerging
sub-discipline of our field, the scholarship of creating, analyzing,
and disseminating humanist learning electronically. This issue
features articles describing these projects and others like them —
new work of high quality that is expanding the depth and breadth of
our field. It also looks back at the history of this sub-discipline,
and forward toward emerging standards, tools, and potentials.
Issue 1
Issue 1: New Epigrams Attributed to Posidippus of Pella.
Editors: Gregory Nagy and James O'Donnell. Guest Editors of Issue
One: Benjamin Acosta-Hughes, Elizabeth Kosmetatou, Martine Cuypers, and
Francesca Angiò.
First Drafts@Classics@
This section of the Classics@ site is devoted to new and developing
scholarship. It allows for a “pre-publication”: a way for scholars at
any stage of career to share their research even before it goes through a
formal publication process. The purpose of pre-publication is twofold:
one, to get new ideas and work available to the public in a timely way,
and two, to have a forum for a wider range of feedback that will in turn
aid in the formal peer review process. With that second purpose in
mind, we hope to expand this section in the near future to include
discussion boards for dialogue between authors and readers. In the
meantime, feedback and submissions for First Drafts@Classics@ should be
sent to the CHS Executive Editors: Casey Dué (casey@chs.harvard.edu) and
Mary Ebbott (ebbott@chs.harvard.edu).
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment