Whole New Testament
Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Η
Καινη Διαθηκη. Novum Testamentum Graecum Ita Adornatum Ut Textus
Probatarum Editionum Medullam Margo Variantium Lectionum in Suas Classes
Distributarum Locorumque Parallelorum Delectum Apparatus Subiunctus
Criseos Sacrae Millianae Praesertim Compendium, Limam, Supplementum Ac
Fructum Exhibeat Inserviente Jo. Alberto Bengelio. Tübingen: Cotta, 1734.
Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Apparatus
Criticus Ad Novum Testamentum Criseos Sacrae Compendium, Limam,
Supplementum Ac Fructum Exhibens. Editio Secunda Curis B. Auctoris
Posterioribus Aucta et Emendata, Copiosoque Indice Instructa. Edited by Philipp David Burk. Tübingen: Cotta, 1763.
Comfort, Philip W. New
Testament Text and Translation Commentary: Commentary on the Variant
Readings of the Ancient New Testament Manuscripts and How They Relate to
the Major English Translations. Carol Stream, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers Inc., 2008.
Comfort, Philip W. A Commentary on the Manuscripts and Text of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic, 2015.
Comfort, Philip W. A Commentary on Textual Additions to the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic, 2017.
Doedes, Jacobus Izaak. Verhandeling over de tekstkritiek des Nieuwen Verbonds. Haarlem: Bohn, 1844.
Donaldson,
Amy M. “Explicit References to New Testament Variant Readings Among
Greek and Latin Church Fathers.” PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame,
2009. Available here: https://curate.nd.edu/show/5712m615k50. Note:
If you haven’t been reading Amy Donaldson’s work, what have you been
doing with your life? It’s not really a textual commentary, but it
contains a kind of anthology of patristic text-critical discussions.
Loken, Israel P., and Rick Brannan. Lexham Textual Notes on the Bible. Lexham Press, 2014. Note from publisher’s website: “For
comparison, these notes are more than one might find as a footnote in a
modern Bible translation, but less than what one would find in a
textual commentary such as those by Metzger, Comfort, or Alford.”
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. London: United Bible Societies, 1971.
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 1st ed., corrected. Stuttgart: United Bible Societies, 1975. Note: I haven’t checked what the corrections are or what differences there are between these two editions.
Metzger, Bruce M. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Biblegesellschaft, 1994.
Nestle, Eberhard. “Textkritische Bemerkungen Zu Einzelnen Stellen Des NT.s.” In Einführung in das Griechische Neue Testament, 2nd ed., 208–265. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1899.
Published in English as:
Nestle, Eberhard. “Critical Notes on Various Passages of the New Testament.” In Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the Greek New Testament, edited by Allan Menzies, translated by William Edie, 247–335. London: Williams and Norgate, 1901.
New English Translation - Novum Testamentum Graece New Testament. Stuttgart/Dallas: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft/NET Bible Press, 2004. Note: There
are some text-critical notes that accompany the NET Bible. I cite the
NET+NA27 edition here simply because it was the edition I found at
Tyndale House when I made this update to the list.
Omanson, Roger L. A Textual Guide to the Greek New Testament. Stuttgart: Deutsche Biblegesellschaft, 2006. Note: I am not sure if this book does much more than simplify/expand/explain Metzger’s Textual Commentary.
I admit I haven’t spent a whole lot of time with it, but when I have
consulted it, it’s usually just been Metzger re-worded and explained.
Scrivener,
Frederick Henry Ambrose. “Application of the Foregoing Materials and
Principles to the Criticism of Select Passages of the New Testament.” In
A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament for the Use of Biblical Students, edited by Edward Miller, 4th ed., 2:321–412. London: George Bell & Sons, 1894.
Westcott, B. F., and F. J. A. Hort. “Appendix I. Notes on Select Readings,” in Introduction to the New Testament in the Original Greek. New York: Harper and Brothers, 1882. Note:
I’m not sure if this section could be said to be Westcott and Hort or
just Hort. On p. 18 of the book, we find the following statement: “For
the principles, arguments, and conclusions set forth in the Introduction
and Appendix both editors are alike responsible. It was however for
various reasons expedient that their exposition and illustration should
proceed throughout from a single hand ; and the writing of this volume
and the other accompaniments of the text has devolved on Dr Hort.” Update: Resolved (see comments below by Peter Gurry).
Gospels
Multiple Gospels
Weiss, Bernhard. Textkritik der vier Evangelien. TUGAL NF 4.2. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1899.
Wheeler, Frank. “Textual Criticism and the Synoptic Problem: A Textual
Commentary on the Minor Agreements of Matthew and Luke Against Mark.”
PhD diss., Baylor University, 1985.
Matthew
Blass, Friedrich. Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Matthäus (BFCT 4.4; Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1900). Note from Jan Krans-Plasier: “To be consulted together with Friedrich Blass, Euangelium secundum Matthaeum cum variae lectionis delectu (Leipzig: Teubner, 1901). There is more by Blass, e.g. his editions of Luke, John, Acts, and Hebrews.”
Borland, Jonathan C., Mike Arcieri, and Maurice A. Robinson. “A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament,” 2010–2017. https://tcgnt.blogspot.com/. Note: Takes a Byzantine priority position but only covers Matt. 1:5–8:4 (as of 5 July 2020).
Miller, Edward. A Textual Commentary upon the Holy Gospels, Part 1-14. London: George Bell & Sons, 1899. Note:
This work defends a ‘traditional text,’ but I admit I haven’t read it
enough to know if it simply defends the textus receptus at every point
by any means necessary, if it usually defends the textus receptus but
occasionally breaks from it in favour of majority text readings, etc.
Mark
Blass, Friedrich. Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Markus (BFCT 3.3; Gütersloh: Bertelsmann, 1899).
Elliott, J. K. “An Eclectic Textual Commentary on the Greek Text of Mark’s Gospel.” In New Testament Textual Criticism: Its Significance for Exegesis. Essays in Honour of Bruce M. Metzger, edited by Eldon J. Epp and Gordon D. Fee, 47–60. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.
Reprinted as:
Elliott, J. K. “An Eclectic Textual Commentary on the Greek Text of Mark’s Gospel.” In Essays and Studies in New Testament Textual Criticism, 159–170. Estudios de Filologia Neotestamentaria 3. Cordoba: Ediciones el Almendro, 1992.
Elliott, J. K. “An Eclectic Textual Commentary on the Greek Text of Mark’s Gospel.” In The
Language and Style of the Gospel of Mark: An Edition of C. H. Turner’s
“Notes on Marcan Usage” Together with Other Comparable Studies, 189–201. NovTSup 71. Leiden: Brill, 1993.
Greeven, Heinrich, and Eberhard Güting. Textkritik Des Markusevangeliums. Münster: LIT-Verlag, 2005.
Haelewyck, Jean-Claude. “The Healing of a Leper (Mark 1,40-45): A Textual Commentary.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 89.1 (2013): 15–36.
Turner, C. H. “A Textual Commentary on Mark I.” JTS (o.s.) 28.2 (1927): 145–58.
Wasserman, Tommy. “A Short Textual Commentary on the Lucan Travel Narrative (
Luke 9:51–19:46).” In
Getting Into the Text: New Testament Essays in Honor of David Alan Black, edited by Daniel L. Akin and Thomas W. Hudgins, 90–115. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2017.
Acts + Catholic Epistles
Acts
Wachtel, Klaus. “Text-Critical Commentary.” In Novum Testamentum
Graecum Editio Critica Maior: III Die Apostelgeschichte / Acts of the
Apostles. Teil 3: Studien / Part 3: Studies, edited by Holger
Strutwolf, Georg Gäbel, Annette Hüffmeier, Gerd Mink, and Klaus Wachtel,
1–38. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2017.
Rius-Camps, Josep, and Jenny Read-Heimerdinger. The Message of Acts in Codex Bezae: A Comparison with the Alexandrian Tradition. 4 vols. JSNTSup/LNTS. London: Bloomsbury T. & T. Clark, 2004–2009. Note: I mention this 4-volume set simply because of its idiosyncratic emphasis on a particular strand of the manuscript tradition.
Weiss, Bernhard. Die Apostelgeschichte: Textkritische Untersuchungen und Textherstellung. TUGAL, 9.3/4. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs, 1893.
Catholic Epistles
Wachtel, Klaus. Der byzantinische Text der katholischen Briefe: eine Untersuchung zur Entstehung der Koine des Neuen Testaments. ANTF 24. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1995. Note: The textual commentary section of this work concerns the Teststellen used in the Text und Textwert volumes.
Weiss, Bernhard. Die katholischen Briefe: Textkritische Untersuchungen und Textherstellung. TUGAL, 8.3. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs, 1892.
Jude
Albin, Carl Axel. Judasbrevet: traditionen, texten, tolkningen. Stockholm: Natur och kultur, 1962. Note: Thanks to Thomas Kraus for directing me to this one.
Landon, Charles. A Text-Critical Study of the Epistle to Jude. JSNTSup 135. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.
Wasserman, Tommy. The Epistle of Jude: Its Text and Transmission. ConBNT 43. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 2006.
Paul (Including Hebrews)
More than one letter
Erasmus, Desiderius. Annotations on Galatians and Ephesians. Edited and translated by Reimer A. Faber. Collected Works of Erasmus 58. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. Note:
I include Erasmus’ Annotations for historical value even though they
are really more like a category I have rejected—commentaries that
address variants. Additionally, I only include here the volumes
currently available in English translation; the rest are, of course,
available in Latin.
Weiss, Bernhard. Textkritik der paulinischen Briefe. TUGAL 14.3. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1896.
Romans
Erasmus, Desiderius. Annotations on Romans. Translated by John B.
Payne, Albert Rabil Jr., Robert D. Sider, and Warren S. Smith Jr.
Collected Works of Erasmus 56. Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
1994.
1 Corinthians
Kloha, Jeffrey. “A Textual Commentary on Paul’s First Epistle to the
Corinthians.” PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 2006. (Four volumes!)
Galatians
Carlson, Stephen C. The Text of Galatians and Its History. WUNT 2.385. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.
Wasserman, Tommy. “A Short Textual Commentary on Galatians.” In Studies
on the Text of the New Testament and Early Christianity: Essays in
Honor of Michael W. Holmes On the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, edited by Daniel M. Gurtner, Juan Hernández Jr., and Paul Foster, 345–371. NTTSD 50. Leiden: Brill, 2015.
Philippians
Price, James D. “A Computer-Aided Textual Commentary on the Book of Philippians.” Grace Theological Journal 8.2 (1987): 253–290.
Rodgers, Peter R. “A Textual Commentary on
Philippians 2.5–11.” In
Text and Community: Essays in Memory of Bruce M. Metzger, Volume 1, edited by J. Harold Ellens, 187–195. New Testament Monographs 19. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007.
2 Thessalonians
Edwards, Grant G. “The Text and Transmission of 2 Thessalonians.” PhD thesis, University of Birmingham, 2019. Note:
The thesis is defended but not available yet, but I’ve seen the Table
of Contents, and one of the chapters is a textual commentary. I imagine
it will probably be part of a published version eventually, but I
mention it here as the PhD thesis because it hasn’t been published yet.
Zimmer, Friedrich. Der Text der Thessalonicherbriefe: samt textkritischem Apparat und Kommentar. Quedlinburg: Chr. Friedr. Viewegs, 1893. Note: This
work is different from Zimmer’s earlier work listed below, and this one
is hard to describe. There’s an introduction on text-critical method,
discussions of manuscripts, etc, and a critical text with an apparatus
that blends things together—the manuscript witnesses like a normal
apparatus and also bits of commentary mixed in.
Zimmer, Friedrich. “Zur Textkritik des zweiten Thessalonicherbriefes.” Zeitschrift für Wissenschafliche Theologie 31 (1888): 322–342. Note: No shame in admitting that I only know about Zimmer because of Grant.
The Pastorals
Elliott, J. K. The Greek Text of the Epistles to Timothy and Titus. Studies and Documents 26. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1968.
A slight revision of:
Elliott, J. K. “An Examination of the Greek Text of the Epistles to
Timothy and Titus.” DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, 1967. UPDATE:
Two of the three volumes of this thesis available
here.
Philemon
Solomon, S. Matthew. “The Textual History of Philemon.” PhD. diss., New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, 2014. Note:
The majority of this work consists of an extensive edition of Philemon
with all variants in all known manuscripts (up to 2014; P139 had not
been published yet), but it contains a textual commentary section at the
end.
Hebrews
Bruce, F. F. “Textual Problems in the Epistle to the Hebrews.” In Scribes and Scripture: New Testament Essays in Honor of J. Harold Greenlee, edited by David Alan Black, 27–39. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1992. Note: It was by reading Bruce that I learned that John Calvin (and Erasmus before him) advocated a conjectural emendation at Hebrews 11:37. Calvin rejected the textus receptus there, writing, “The words ‘they were tempted’ seem superfluous, and I have no
doubt that the likeness of the two words επρίσθησαν and έπειράσθησαν was the reason why the second gradually crept into the text being
added erroneously by some ignorant scribe, as Erasmus conjectures“
(p. 184 of Johnston’s 1963 translation). On this conjecture, see its
entry in the Amsterdam Database of New Testament Conjectural
Emendation: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/nt-conjectures?histID=s25589.
Revelation
Aune, David E. Revelation. 3 Volumes. Word Biblical Commentary 52a–52c. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1998.
Elliott, J. K. “A Short Textual Commentary on the Book of Revelation and the ‘New’ Nestle.” NovT 56.1 (2014): 68–100.
Schmid, Josef. Studies in the History of the Greek Text of the Apocalypse: The Ancient Stems.
Translated and edited by Juan Hernández, Jr., Garrick V. Allen, and
Darius Müller. Text-Critical Studies 11. Atlanta: SBL Press, 2018.
Originally published as:
Schmid, Josef. Die alten Stämme, vol. 2 of Studien zur Geschichte des griechischen Apokalypse-Textes. MThS 2. Munich: Zink, 1955.
Weiss, Bernhard. Die Johannes-Apokalypse: Textkritische Untersuchungen und Textherstellung. TUGAL, 7.1. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichs, 1891.
———
Finally (things that I add here for fun)
I’d like to point readers to Drew Longacre’s list of
Old Testament text-critical resources, which includes a section on the “Text-Critical Commentaries, Monographs, and Lists of Variants” that are available online.
Also, this one caught me by surprise, because it is completely outside
of the circles I travel in. Royal Skousen has written what looks to me
like a textual commentary on textual variants in the Book of Mormon, and
it’s available online,
here.
Posts
Stumble It!
No comments:
Post a Comment